In the dynamic world of legal practice, a recent article has sent shockwaves through the industry, sparking conversations that resonate far beyond the surface. Imagine a single act that wields the power to sway bonuses within a law firm.  The increased emphasis on time entry discipline is all part of the effort to increase revenues when market demand for legal work is down.  Despite billing rate increases, firms may see softer demand for work and client reluctance to accept rate increases. 

Legal Decoder has been tracking delinquent time entries since its inception.  Per our rule set, delinquent time entries are defined as line items dated 60+ days outside of the invoice date.  In most cases, an astonishing 80% of flagged time entries revealed the presence of one or more critical issues. 

While certain clients diligently upheld the practice of punctual time entries, others, constrained by the nuances of their engagements (e.g., bankruptcies), chose a more lenient path. Yet, make no mistake—time entry discipline now occupies prime real estate in the minds of firm leaders, particularly as their competitors embrace and enforce this very rigor. 

Unveiling Delinquent Time Entry Insights 

When time entries were flagged as delinquent, 40% of additional issues were related to Billing Hygiene.  The most common issues were block-billing, repeated narrative entries, vague entries, and non-specific communication (no subject, no counterparty).  For block billing, lumping a day’s work into one entry might seem easier but also invites scrutiny when work cannot be easily traced back to time.  Entries flagged as repeated narratives (within an invoice), vague entries, and non-specific communication could signal last minute entries filled in before an invoice deadline but not accurately describe work performed. 

Workflow Efficiency issues were flagged nearly 35% when a time entry was delinquent.  Office communication (excessive internal communications among outside counsel) and incremental communications stood out as issues when an entry was flagged as delinquent.  Time entries flagged as repeated tasks, like repeated narratives within billing hygiene, was another issue associated with delinquent time entries.    

Conclusion: Unraveling the Data 

Amidst the complex analysis of delinquent time entries, the quintessential query arises – what's the larger narrative? A delayed entry might signify not just tardiness in timekeeping, but a broader snail's pace in invoice generation. Many invoices we dissected were suspended for 60+ or 90+ days from the inception of work. Swifter invoicing might ignite a domino effect, fostering disciplined time entries and accelerating the pace of invoice reviews. Yet, beyond the pragmatic, this scrutiny unearths deeper truths. Delinquent entries might be the symptoms of systemic flaws within a firm's policies and practices, revealing the foundations upon which transformation must be built.